What makes your company stand out?
This moving company has not yet answered this question.
Services
International removals
Excess baggage
Car & Vehicle transport
Piano transport
Pet transport
Art transport
About
Vanpac GroupAsia offer moving services to multinational organisations, US military, Embassies and private customers. Vanpac GroupAsia is well positioned to handle between Asia and across the World. Vanpac GroupAsia has built its reputation on consistently delivering high standards of service across the moving industry.
Gallery
View all
Sirelo asks...
What is your insurance policy? How do you deal with damaged items?
This moving company has not yet answered this question.
What is the best advice you would give to customers?
This moving company has not yet answered this question.
Have you moved with this company?
We'd love to hear about your experience.
Reviews
123
Sirelo and Google reviews
70% of the users recommend this moving company
C.
25 June 2024
on Sirelo
I moved a mattress from US to Singapore.
They gave me a quote which I accepted.
When the package was in transit, they surprised me with an ADDITIONAL $700 in fees and threatened to not release my goods until it was paid. This was far beyond what was expected. THis was hidden in the fine print and no estimate was given. Do not use this company.
They gave me a quote which I accepted.
When the package was in transit, they surprised me with an ADDITIONAL $700 in fees and threatened to not release my goods until it was paid. This was far beyond what was expected. THis was hidden in the fine print and no estimate was given. Do not use this company.
Price
Moved from Hartford (United States) to Singapore (Singapore)
S.S.
9 April 2022
on Sirelo
The packing crew , perfect!
The only thing I did not like, the exchange rate from US$ to sing$ for the insurance!
That was ridiculous high.
Second point I didn’t like, was that we were told we might had to leave boxes behind because of lack of space in a 20ft container! I was very careful and threw lots of stuff away, in the end, the container was 70% full, so unnecessary and we could have taken lots more!
The only thing I did not like, the exchange rate from US$ to sing$ for the insurance!
That was ridiculous high.
Second point I didn’t like, was that we were told we might had to leave boxes behind because of lack of space in a 20ft container! I was very careful and threw lots of stuff away, in the end, the container was 70% full, so unnecessary and we could have taken lots more!
Price
As above
Moved from Singapore (Singapore) to Wassenaar (Netherlands)
D.M.
15 October 2019
on Sirelo
My experience with Vanpac Group Asia was good until I realized they lied to me about the volume of my items and as a result ended up paying S$750 more than I had to.
Being over-charged S$750 sucks and it’s a significant amount but my primary motivation for trying to correct it was to communicate with the management of the company about the fact that one of its employees was lying to its customers.
What became appalling to me, as I learned, was the lack of interest in the management that I had been lied to. I guess they took the position that I was no longer living in SG and therefore they could take advantage of me. Following are the bullet points of how things transpired:
-- Original quote for 4 cubic meters (cbm).
Items were picked up and I was told the actual volume was close to 5 cubic meters but would not be charged more.
-- The following day, I decided to add my queen-size mattress to the shipment. Was told that would bring my volume to 6 cbm and would be charged an extra S$750. I felt this was too high for a single mattress, given the total cost of my move, which was less than S$4000, but was told it was not negotiable given the 6 cbm volume of my items. I reluctantly agreed and my mattress was picked up.
-- When my items were about to arrive to the USA, I received an email from Schumacher (the shipping company) informing me of the status. I noticed the indicated volume on their email was for 4 cbm and I thought that was odd.
-- I informed my contact at Vanpac Group Asia about this and he insisted it was a mistake on their part. I was a bit suspicious at the time but there was nothing I could do.
-- The items were delivered to me in in the USA and the delivery document clearly stated that the volume being delivered was 4.22 cbm. I was told all my items were measured upon arrival into the USA.
-- I sent an image of this document to my contact at Vanpac Group Asia and he told me a story about how the extra empty space was because it was sent via group-share. The purpose of sending items group-share is to avoid having to spend for empty space so I told him that his answer was not acceptable. Besides, if I was true that I was to pay for empty space, it had never been mentioned before. He insisted that I could not get a refund and I told him I wanted to speak with his manager.
-- I informed his manager of the situation and he told me he was willing to give me a partial refund, S$300. Since the charge was based on the lie that my items were close to 6 cbm, and that the total volume was just above the 4 cbm that I had originally been quoted, I insisted on a full refund. Saying anything less was fraud and unexceptable.
-- I mentioned to the manager that I was not satisfied with his response and he told me that he was sorry but that it was company policy. I responded by saying that I seriously doubt that it is company policy to overcharge customers and to act indifferent about it.
-- I tried to escalate higher in the organization with no success. I even wrote to the Managing Director informing him of my interest to speak with him. When I received no response, I wrote him a detailed account of the situation asking for time to speak and that too was ignored.
-- In my attempt to speak with someone of power in the organization, I called the USA and UK branches of the company and was told they were separate companies. During this research process, I spoke to someone from Vanpac in the UK who told me that what happened to me was not normal practice across the organization. He was shocked to learn what his counterparts in Singapore had done, was willing to help me connect with senior management in Singapore. But he was quickly told to back off and not to get involved.
Like I said before, this is only my experience and I am sure many other people have had good experiences with this moving company.Read more
Being over-charged S$750 sucks and it’s a significant amount but my primary motivation for trying to correct it was to communicate with the management of the company about the fact that one of its employees was lying to its customers.
What became appalling to me, as I learned, was the lack of interest in the management that I had been lied to. I guess they took the position that I was no longer living in SG and therefore they could take advantage of me. Following are the bullet points of how things transpired:
-- Original quote for 4 cubic meters (cbm).
Items were picked up and I was told the actual volume was close to 5 cubic meters but would not be charged more.
-- The following day, I decided to add my queen-size mattress to the shipment. Was told that would bring my volume to 6 cbm and would be charged an extra S$750. I felt this was too high for a single mattress, given the total cost of my move, which was less than S$4000, but was told it was not negotiable given the 6 cbm volume of my items. I reluctantly agreed and my mattress was picked up.
-- When my items were about to arrive to the USA, I received an email from Schumacher (the shipping company) informing me of the status. I noticed the indicated volume on their email was for 4 cbm and I thought that was odd.
-- I informed my contact at Vanpac Group Asia about this and he insisted it was a mistake on their part. I was a bit suspicious at the time but there was nothing I could do.
-- The items were delivered to me in in the USA and the delivery document clearly stated that the volume being delivered was 4.22 cbm. I was told all my items were measured upon arrival into the USA.
-- I sent an image of this document to my contact at Vanpac Group Asia and he told me a story about how the extra empty space was because it was sent via group-share. The purpose of sending items group-share is to avoid having to spend for empty space so I told him that his answer was not acceptable. Besides, if I was true that I was to pay for empty space, it had never been mentioned before. He insisted that I could not get a refund and I told him I wanted to speak with his manager.
-- I informed his manager of the situation and he told me he was willing to give me a partial refund, S$300. Since the charge was based on the lie that my items were close to 6 cbm, and that the total volume was just above the 4 cbm that I had originally been quoted, I insisted on a full refund. Saying anything less was fraud and unexceptable.
-- I mentioned to the manager that I was not satisfied with his response and he told me that he was sorry but that it was company policy. I responded by saying that I seriously doubt that it is company policy to overcharge customers and to act indifferent about it.
-- I tried to escalate higher in the organization with no success. I even wrote to the Managing Director informing him of my interest to speak with him. When I received no response, I wrote him a detailed account of the situation asking for time to speak and that too was ignored.
-- In my attempt to speak with someone of power in the organization, I called the USA and UK branches of the company and was told they were separate companies. During this research process, I spoke to someone from Vanpac in the UK who told me that what happened to me was not normal practice across the organization. He was shocked to learn what his counterparts in Singapore had done, was willing to help me connect with senior management in Singapore. But he was quickly told to back off and not to get involved.
Like I said before, this is only my experience and I am sure many other people have had good experiences with this moving company.Read more
Lied about volume and overcharged
Indifferent about fraudulent practices
Moved from Singapore (Singapore) to Virginia (United States)
Rob Heijliger
5 October 2019
on Sirelo
good service to get the contract. very good packing squad. quick and safe shipping. good agent on Marselles. wrong address which caused container home shuttling to be longer than necessary. skeleton screw to unload which obliged me to help out.
price
service
wrong address in france
skeleton crew for unloading
Moved from Singapore (Singapore) to Cabrieres D'avignon (France)
S.M.
29 September 2019
on Sirelo
This is my fourth international move. I have fair amount of idea on such moves.
For my recent move (Singapore to Canada), I have contacted several movers before selecting vanpac. I consider myself lucky that I choose Vanpac. They have delivered my goods on time without any issues.
First of all, Vanpac provided me the price and confidence during the selection process.
Secondly, the coordinator was super efficient and kept me warm with all the updates.
Third, the packers on either sides were super efficient.
Lastly the delivery was spot on.
They are highly recommend.
For my recent move (Singapore to Canada), I have contacted several movers before selecting vanpac. I consider myself lucky that I choose Vanpac. They have delivered my goods on time without any issues.
First of all, Vanpac provided me the price and confidence during the selection process.
Secondly, the coordinator was super efficient and kept me warm with all the updates.
Third, the packers on either sides were super efficient.
Lastly the delivery was spot on.
They are highly recommend.
Excellent pricing
Efficient correspondence. Always keeps customer informed.
Moved from Singapore (Singapore) to Ottawa (Canada)
L.A.
26 August 2019
on Sirelo
Best moving experience I have ever had! Would like to use them again on my next assignment. Their packing team was great and was very fast. It was really a pleasant experience and will surely recommend them to all of my friends!
Professional
Cost friendly
Moved from Singapore (Singapore) to Ho Chi Minh (Vietnam)
